How New B-21 Stealth Bomber Compares To B-2A
A new rendering of the Northrop Grumman B-21A released by the U.S. Air Force Jan. 31 offers a fresh perspective on the overall size and features of the highly secretive stealth bomber, revealing an aircraft that, as expected, broadly resembles the B-2A but with several important differences.
Click on the interactive pieces below to see the differences.
Photo Credit: Northrop Grumman
Some analysts have speculated the Air Force wanted a new bomber about two-thirds the size of the B-2A, and the rendering appear to back up those estimates. Tellingly, the images show a single-truck main landing gear for the B-21, indicating an aircraft significantly lighter than the B-2, which requires a double-truck gear.
Air Force leaders unanimously say the program is on track and running smoothly, but some concerns still have emerged.It’s possible the renderings offer only a partial—and even intentionally inaccurate or obscured—early glimpse of the final, pre-flight test design of the B-21, but it could be another two years before the first real aircraft comes into public view.
Northrop started assembling the first test airframe for the B-21 in the Site 4 complex at Plant 42 in Palmdale, California—possibly in the same assembly bay of Building 401 where the B-2 fleet was assembled over 25 years ago.
This is an abbreviated version of the premium Aerospace Daily & Defense Report article "New B-21A Renderings Reveal Diminutive Size Compared To B-2A". Subscribe to access the full analysis. Already an AWIN subscriber? Log in to read the full analysis.
Comments
Back to the drawing board and, please offer one world class aviation news service. again, soon. This is not working, sorry.
Conditions at this website are likely even worse than Mr Evratz describes.
Access is usually denied, photos don't render, always locks up my devices so bad I have to shut down and reboot...terrible frustrating.
Getting to archives is a complete battle to get there...then fails.
Failure at the site is continuous.
I get much less reading material than the old website.
Contact says again and again .... "try it now"... Same problems, no progress...site crashes or locks up.
Not going to renew this year...is a waste of money...a rip off..to state it mildly.
Thank you.
Two - When will you be changing your name from Aviation Weekly to Aviation Bi-Weekly?
Three - I am beginning to have problems telling your articles from the advertising. Any suggestions??
Many Thanks
I've complained repeatedly about how the site (doesn't) work - it just falls on deaf ears.
Fortunately, I didn't cancel the paper subscription because if I was stuck with this site, I'd ask for my money back and leave.
AWS&T should get its own site rather than continue with the current sham. Wasting time trying to access an interesting article is frustrating ... please make it clearer which subscription is required fro which article. If you believe you already do so ... you are wrong!
Seriously considering terminating subscription.
Just saying.