Lockheed Defies U.S. Army Decision, Protests FLRAA Contract Award

Defiant
Defiant
Credit: Lockheed Martin

A Lockheed Martin-led team will challenge the Future Long Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA) contract award to Bell, raising a new administrative hurdle to proceeding with the $8.2 billion development program for the U.S. Army’s first high-speed rotorcraft. 

“The data and discussions lead us to believe the proposals were not consistently evaluated to deliver the best value in the interest of our Army, our soldiers and American taxpayers,” Lockheed said in a statement released on Dec. 28. 

The protest filed with the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) comes 23 days after the Army picked the Bell V-280 Valor tiltrotor for the FLRAA contract. The Army specifically awarded a $1.2 billion contract for Bell to deliver a virtual prototype of the V-280, with a follow-on, $7.1 billion deal for Bell to complete engineering and manufacturing development. 

A Lockheed/Boeing team offered the Defiant X for FLRAA, proposing a coaxial rotor with a pusher propeller with slightly less speed and footprint than the V-280. 

The protest bid sets up an administrative challenge that the GAO limits to 100 days, a period that expires on April 7. 

But the move adds new pressure on the Army’s aggressive schedule for the FLRAA program. The contract award was originally set for the second quarter of 2022, but was delayed by several months. The Army once planned to field the first operational unit in 2034, but accelerated the deployment plan by four years in 2019. The first operational FLRAA unit is now expected to be ready for combat in mid-2030. 

The fate of the FLRAA contract award has significant implications for the industrial base. The program will replace a large portion of the Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk fleet, the most successful military helicopter in terms of sales in the modern era. The selection of the V-280 pushed the Army into embracing Bell’s tiltrotor approach, which had been pioneered by the U.S. Marine Corps with the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey.

Steve Trimble

Steve covers military aviation, missiles and space for the Aviation Week Network, based in Washington DC.

Comments

3 Comments
That phrase, "...pushed the Army into embracing Bell's tiltrotor approach..." seems rather negative, doesn't it? After all, the Army selected it themselves. Perhaps, "...demonstrates that the Army is also embracing Bell's tiltrotor approach..." is more accurate?
With ~2000 units to be purchased over the next decade plus, a split order between a tilt rotor concept with its own troubles and a more traditional yet maturing dual rotor helicopter would seem to make sense. Don’t put all the eggs in one basket.
Army is in a tough spot. Neither offered air vehicle architecture is anything like an elegant or comprehensive solution. Still, industrial base and competitive concerns require support of at least two suppliers. So, tilt-rotor (Bell) gets the transport role, while recon will go to to the craft with contra-rotors (Sikorsky). That configuration has superior weapons release geometry. Army will get expensive, fussy flying machines with unmanageable logistics tails. Industry will distribute bonuses. Hopefully, emerging technologies will soon develop truly efficient VTOL system architectures so the present intricate mess can be stepped over.